twitter facebook

Pierre ‘The Bear’ Lamarche: What Should Be Done – Let Our Canadian Coaches Dream

Pierre ‘The Bear’ Lamarche: What Should Be Done – Let Our Canadian Coaches Dream

Written by: Pierre ‘The Bear’ Lamarche

__________

***Pierre Lamarche has been an outspoken proponent of Canadian tennis and how the sport should have a major place in the Canadian sport landscape. He believes this lofty ambition can only be achieved through the combination of success on the international professional competitive scene, with the required domestic infrastructure and a true partnership between Tennis Canada and the tennis private sector.

His comments are often taken as critical by those who feel targeted by his questions. His background as a player, coach, and leader [see background] in the sport and coaching industry warrants that his views, which are shared by many others, be given due process by anyone [or organization] who really wants to help Canadian Tennis achieve the proper national status it deserves in the sport community.***

__________

We are publishing an article this week by Paul McNamee on a situation occurring in Australia which is common to many tennis countries where the National Association is bent on rewriting how tennis players are developed. These decisions affect basic principle of child development as it relates to teacher/young students [or player/coach relationships in tennis].

You must understand who Paul McNamee is:

  1. He is a former top 25 ATP singles player
  2. He is a former #1 ATP Doubles player
  3. He is a former Grand Slam Doubles Champion
  4. He is a two time member of Australia’s Davis Cup winning team
  5. He is the former Head of Tennis Australia
  6. He founded the Hopman Cup and acted as tournament director
  7. He acted as the tournament Director for the Australian Golf Championships
  8. He is a coach on the WTA tour
  9. HE IS THE REAL THING

So what he says has validity. Please make sure you read that article.

National Associations desire to control tennis development, comes from the poorly designed concept developed by the International Tennis Federation [the governing body of National Associations] to develop national and regional centers across the world. The ITF used to be the sole authority for tennis in the world. With the advent of professional tennis, their position in the world tennis landscape diminished greatly. They were left with Davis Cup and Fed Cup as well as the Slams, but make no mistake the ITF was no longer the power of tennis.

The well funded ITF turned its focus on tennis development. One of the basic assumptions made by the ITF was that coaches from poorer countries were incapable of developing top players, so they created ITF training centres all over the world. They hired their own coaches, assisted in developing centers and waited to see the results. The stories surrounding these centers could make up a book which could be seen as tragic or comic. For example the African Training Center was based in South Africa which made it impossible for anyone from the rest of Africa to attend. There has been numerous centers across the continent and the number of professional players developed in over 20 years at the center under ITF coaches is… I am still looking for one. Can you name any African continent players in the top 100? All these regrouping centers have accomplished zilch and we are copying the system. England and Australia have tried and still find themselves searching for answers. France which had success has now even adopted a more comprehensive, inclusive approach. Spain has basically abandoned the concept except for players who do not have an academy to train at or a proper personal coach. The new flag bearers of this ill conceived concept is the US, where everyone knows, millions have been wasted in the last ten years. Look at their [US] results on the ATP tour versus Canada with a player developed by his personal coach and parents, who called the national center his home for two years, when he was on the road more than 2/3 of the year, is ranked higher than any US player, is trained by a personal coach in Spain. Compare the US results to Serbia who has no national center. Need more proof?

These political exercises of creating centers, regrouping the players with better ITF coaches have been a complete failure worldwide. Yes some players have gone through them but the players that achieved success did so because they were provided with touring opportunities not because of the training environment or the player/coach relationship.

National associations [read Tennis Canada] decided to follow the flawed ITF model. In fact the man responsible for this Canadian strategy, Jack Graham from Halifax, is now a member of the ITF executive. Jack’s background is that he is a volunteer, former Chairman of the Board of Tennis Canada, who loves tennis and who is a lawyer by trade. Please compare his background to Paul McNamee and also research the number of great tennis players developed in his own province, Nova Scotia. Jack is a wonderful well meaning person who has the great political qualities to succeed in the political forum of volunteer associations. This does not make him an expert in child and player development.

Canadian coaches had a great reputation in the 1990’s and many are world leaders in the business of coaching. The new policies of Tennis Canada resulted in Canada’s top coaching brains being marginalised and replaced by foreign coaches and obedient young coaches with no history of success. I have no problem with foreign coaches and I believe Louis Borfiga and Guillaume Marx in Montreal are great additions to our Canadian scene. What I have problems with is how we have abused the basic player/coach relationship through the present system.

Most Canadian coaches feel the same way, but unlike me they do not have the benefit of not caring about the repercussions of their public comments. How can you create a great system and great players if the people in the trenches, the personal coaches, are not empowered to dream with their players? This is not nuclear science, it is basic common sense and scientifically proven.

Thanks Paul for articulating what coaches worldwide feel. Hopefully, these national associations with their well meaning volunteers and well remunerated national coaches [who of course agree with the idea] see the light and reinstate the old order where National coaches are there to supplement and support the personal coaches and their players rather than creating chaos and dissention by recruiting them.

Share This Post

This is some text prior to the author information. You can change this text from the admin section of WP-Gravatar  To change this standard text, you have to enter some information about your self in the Dashboard -> Users -> Your Profile box.


7 Responses to “Pierre ‘The Bear’ Lamarche: What Should Be Done – Let Our Canadian Coaches Dream”

  1. 1
    Goran Says:

    Great article.

  2. 2
    A quiet coach Says:

    I must admit as much as I don’t want to that you are 100% right. Thank you for saying what many of us believe.

  3. 3
    A friend Says:

    Pierre, you always spoke up, most of the time you were right. This time you are speaking for so many of us, who are these people that make these decisions? I understand the coaches that agree with them, they are all getting a paycheck. To bad they can’t stand up for what is right.

  4. 4
    Mark Says:

    Bear,

    I am in Nova Scotia so I do not see whats happening in Ontario and Quebec too much.

    What about Bob Brett and his involvement, hasnt he developed some good young kids into top world ranked juniors since he has been there? As well as develop some of our Canadian coaches with his knowledge.

    Mark

  5. 5
    Lezlie Murch Says:

    Pierre you have hit the nail on the head! Great article. The question is now What can we, as coaches, do in order to ensure change? As the article states, many of the coaches feel powerless.

  6. 6
    Anonymous Says:

    Pierre, your articles are excellent and you are doing a great job of creating discussion and debate about tennis development in our country.

    Much of the focus recently has been National associations taking on a more active role, with a hands on approach, to the development of its players. One of the earlier arguments (which was interesting fair ) was whether public money should be used to compete with, and steal business from, the private Academy’s. It then moved towards the actual efficacy of these National training centers and whether they do indeed provide a better environment for the elite juniors. And now we have the issue of how demoralizing it is for local coaches to lose their players to the National Centers where their talent, hard work and commitment is robbed from them and perhaps in many cases, from the player as well.

    I think it is important now to point out the somewhat hypocritical nature of these points being raised. For the pro, the Academy’s are just as much “sharks in the water” as the National Training Centers. As you pointed out earlier, your Academy is very generous with scholarshiping players, as are many others. Although these scholarships are framed as “need based”, the reality is they are for marketing purposes. Players often move from Academy to Academy depending on their view of the coaching calibre and the scholarship available to them. I’m sure many pro’s inside of your own Academy have poured their heart and soul into a player only to have that player move to another coach and/or academy for financial reasons. What does it matter to that pro whether their player will be stolen away for financial reasons by another Academy or by the National Training Center? It’s also my opinion that the more aggressive an Academy is with scholarshiping, the less revenue they bring in, leaving them with fewer dollars to spend on quality coaches. I think that some pro’s may prefer their player be stolen away by the deep pocketed National organizations where there won’t be financial/coaching constraints caused by aggressive scholarship marketing that is present in some of the private Academy’s. Food for thought……

    You stated in your article above that “What I have problems with is how we have abused the basic player/coach relationship through the present system”. Don’t you realize that you have done the exact same thing to numerous pro’s by taking their players away under the premise of offering more hours on court with better level of practice partners and scholarship monies? Pierre, this is the pot calling the kettle black.

  7. 7
    Tennis Dad Says:

    Anonymous YOU have hit the nail on the head! Great comment!!! The question is now what can we, as coaches, do in order to ensure change? As we all know many of the coaches feel powerless but the reality is we are not!!! WE CAN DREAM and WE CAN (assuming we are skilled enough) CREATE THE BEST PLAYERS IN THE WORLD!!! Lets do it, lets quit the hypocritical jargon, lets quit the excuses!!! Lets quit the sour grapes!!! If you are passionate to do so then do so!!! LETS MAKE CANADA THE TENNIS NATION IT DESERVES TO BE!!!

Leave a Reply